Why publish the framework?
Lead recovery should be explainable. A business should be able to understand why an old enquiry has been prioritised before anyone contacts the customer. LeadRestore is designed around that principle: AI can help organise and draft, but the commercial decision and final customer contact stay with a person.
This page documents the practical signals behind that approach. It does not claim that any one signal guarantees a sale, and it does not turn every historical contact into a lead.
The eight recovery signals
The exclusion layer comes first
Prioritisation should never override suppression. Records that are completed, clearly lost, opted out or otherwise inappropriate to contact should be excluded before recovery scoring. Businesses remain responsible for lawful basis, consent where required, their own do-not-contact rules and any sector-specific obligations.
How the signals work together
LeadRestore does not treat the framework as eight independent tick boxes. A recent enquiry with no buying context may be weak. An older quote with detailed notes, a clear delayed timeline and an unfinished next step may deserve more attention. The useful signal comes from the combination.
That is why LeadRestore returns a priority, a reason and a suggested next message rather than simply producing a list of every old contact.
What the framework deliberately does not do
It does not predict guaranteed revenue. It does not automatically send messages. It does not treat silence as consent. It does not invent missing history. And it does not replace the judgement of the team that owns the customer relationship.
As LeadRestore gathers genuine, appropriately anonymised product evidence, we intend to publish aggregated research about which recovery patterns appear most often. Until then, this methodology is published as the operating framework, not as a claimed conversion study.